ED NOWOGROSKI INC., INC. v. RUCKER

No. 37893-7-I.

944 P.2d 1093 (1997)

88 Wash.App. 350

ED NOWOGROSKI INSURANCE, INC., a Washington corporation, Appellant, v. Michael RUCKER and Monica Rucker, and their marital community; Defendants, Darwin Rieck and Mary Rieck, and their marital community; Appellants, Jerry Kiser and Jana Kiser, and their marital community; Defendants, and Potter Leonard and Cahan, Inc., a Washington corporation, Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

October 13, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven H. Winterbauer, Winterbauer & Associates, Seattle, for Appellants.

Charles E. Watts, Oseran Hahn Van Valin & Watts, Bellevue, for Respondent.


COLEMAN, Judge.

Ed Nowogroski Insurance sued former employees for soliciting its clients with confidential information. The trial court ruled that the employees had misappropriated Nowogroski's trade secrets by retaining and using client lists and other documents. But it awarded no damages for one individual's solicitation of clients with memorized information. Because there is no legal distinction between written and memorized information under the Uniform Trade...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases