SAIF v. LEDIN

93-13841; CA A92669.

941 P.2d 1093 (1997)

149 Or. App. 94

In the Matter of the Compensation of Larry L. Ledin, Claimant. SAIF CORPORATION and Leo Carignan, Petitioners, v. Larry L. LEDIN, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 2, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Julene M. Quinn argued the cause and filed the brief, Salem, for Petitioners.

Gordon S. Gannicott, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were David J. Hollander and Hollander, Lebenbaum & Gannicott.

Before RIGGS, P.J., and LANDAU and LEESON, JJ.


LANDAU, Judge.

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board (Board) setting aside a denial of claimant's consequential condition claim. Employer assigns error to the Board's refusal to allow it to amend its denial. We reverse and remand for reconsideration.

Claimant suffered a compensable injury in 1976 when a saw kicked back and hit him in the face. Following treatment for the injury and closure, claimant developed vision problems...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases