HADSELL v. DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS

No. CA A86175.

942 P.2d 905 (1997)

149 Or. App. 400

Douglas L. HADSELL, Petitioner, v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 23, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas L. Hadsell filed the brief pro se.

Hardy Myers, Attorney General, Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, and Christine Chute, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Pursuant to ORS 183.400(1), petitioner challenges the validity of the Department of Corrections rules, OAR 291, division 104, as inconsistent with ORS 138.135(1). Petitioner's arguments do not provide a basis for invalidating the rules. For that reason, we hold them valid in this case.

Rules...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases