RICHMAN v. W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No. 94 Civ. 6397(PKL).

988 F.Supp. 753 (1997)

Janice RICHMAN, Plaintiff, v. W.L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC., Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

December 30, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mirman, Markovits & Landau, P.C. (Ephrem Wertenteil, of counsel), New York City, for Plaintiff.

Hughes Hubbard & Reed (Daniel H. Weiner, of counsel), New York City, Neal Gerber & Eisenberg (John N. Scholnick, of counsel), Chicago, IL, for Defendant.


OPINION AND ORDER

LEISURE, District Judge.

Plaintiff Janice Richman moves the Court for an order, pursuant to Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Court's inherent authority, modifying and revising the Court's Opinion and Order of March 24, 1995 (the "March 1995 Opinion").1 For the reasons stated below, the motion is denied in part and granted in part.

BACKGROUND

This is a product...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases