The issue in this case is whether a criminal defendant who has testified on his own behalf is entitled to a new trial because the prosecutor told the jury during closing argument that the defendant had an interest or bias in being found not guilty. Adhering to its recent decision in People v. Armstrong,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. BARNEY
678 N.E.2d 1038 (1997)
176 Ill.2d 69
223 Ill.Dec. 30
The PEOPLE of the State of Illinois, Appellee, v. George BARNEY, Appellant.
Supreme Court of Illinois.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 20, 1997.
March 20, 1997.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Daniel D. Yuhas, Deputy Defender, and Jeffrey D. Foust, Assistant Defender, of the Office of the State Springfield, for George Barney.
James E. Ryan, Attorney General, Springfield, and Michael D. Clary, State's Attorney, Danville (Barbara A. Preiner, Solicitor General, and Arleen C. Anderson and Lisa Anne Hoffman, Assistant Attorneys General, Chicago, of counsel), for the People.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.