OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MESTEMAKER

No. 96-2376.

78 Ohio St.3d 92 (1997)

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MESTEMAKER.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 2, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Geoffrey Stern, Disciplinary Counsel, and Alvin E. Matthews, Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for relator.

H. Fred Hoefle, for respondent.


Per Curiam.

Respondent has agreed that in the instances cited his actions violated those Canons of judicial ethics which call upon every judge to observe high standards of conduct both to preserve the integrity of the judiciary and to promote public confidence in the judicial system. Respondent has also acknowledged that his actions violated both the Canon which requires that a judge be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants and others with whom he...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases