1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 115 F.3d
  5. 115 F.3d 1576 (1997)
 

O.I. CORP. v. TEKMAR CO. INC.

No. 96-1427.

115 F.3d 1576 (1997)

O.I. CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. TEKMAR COMPANY INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

As Amended on Limited Grant of Rehearing and Denial of Rehearing July 17, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael O. Sutton, Fish & Richardson P.C., Houston, TX, argued, for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Albert B. Deaver, Jr. Also with him on the brief were Robert E. Hillman, of Boston, MA, and Richard J. Anderson, of Minneapolis, MN.

Jesse J. Jenner, Fish & Neave, of New York City, argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were W. Edward Bailey, William J. McCabe, and Pablo D. Hendler.

Before RICH, MAYER, and LOURIE, Circuit Judges.

As Amended on Limited Grant of Rehearing and Denial of Rehearing In Banc July 17, 1997.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

O.I. Corporation appeals from the summary judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas that Tekmar Company Inc. did not infringe U.S. Patents 5,358,557 and 5,470,380. O.I. Corp. v. Tekmar Co., No. 95-CV-113 (S.D. Tex. June 17, 1996). Because the district court did not err in concluding that there were no genuine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases