DORR-OLIVER INC. v. FLUID QUIP, INC.

No. 93 C 842.

966 F.Supp. 718 (1997)

DORR-OLIVER INCORPORATED, Plaintiff, v. FLUID QUIP, INC., Andrew Franko and Pictek, Inc., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois.

June 5, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Terry Rifkin, Mary Spaulding Burns, Rudnick & Wolfe, Chicago, IL, John P. Luther, Andrew L. Tiajoloff, Alfred H. Hemingway, Jr., Edward P. Kelly, John E. Lynch, Felfe & Lynch, New York City, for Dorr-Oliver Inc.

Thomas W. Flynn, Thomas & Buckley, Chicago, IL, Bruce E. Peacock, Thomas W. Flynn, Matthew R. Jenkins, Biebel & French, Dayton, OH, Patricia Susan Smart, Chicago, IL, John Bostjancich, Smart & Bostjancich, Chicago, IL, for Fluid Quip Inc.

Bruce E. Peacock, Thomas W. Flynn, Matthew R. Jenkins, Biebel & French, Dayton, OH, Patricia Susan Smart, Chicago, IL, John Bostjancich, Smart & Bostjancich, Chicago, IL, for Andrew Franko.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

GETTLEMAN, District Judge.

Defendants seek attorneys' fees as the prevailing parties in this trademark/unfair competition litigation pursuant to Section 35(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1117(a) (" § 35(a)"), and the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act, 815 ILCS 505/10a(c) (the "CFA"). The court should exercise its discretion to award such fees, defendants argue, because this is an "exceptional...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases