POULSEN v. FREAR

No. 960484-CA.

946 P.2d 738 (1997)

Lynn POULSEN, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Karren FREAR, Defendant and Appellee.

Court of Appeals of Utah.

October 9, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lynn Poulsen, Salt Lake City, Plaintiff and Appellant pro se.

Karren Frear, Salt Lake City, Defendant and Appellee pro se.

Before WILKINS, BENCH, and BILLINGS, JJ.


OPINION

BILLINGS, Judge:

Appellant Lynn Poulsen appeals the trial court's decision of no cause of action in her alienation of affections claim. Appellant claims the trial court made improper comments in its Rule 63(b) certifying order, the trial judge was biased against her, and the trial court improperly awarded Rule 11 sanctions. We affirm in part and reverse and remand in part.

FACTS

Appellant filed a complaint alleging alienation of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases