WARNER, Judge.
In contesting the restitution order entered in appellant's criminal prosecution, the appellant claims that the trial court improperly admitted and relied on inadmissible hearsay testimony. The trial court admitted and permitted testimony concerning a list of items which were on the truck stolen by the appellant. Because the list was not a business record within the evidence code, the evidence was inadmissible. We therefore reverse the restitution order...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
