STULL v. HOKE

CC 940503716; CA A86270; SC S43523.

948 P.2d 722 (1997)

326 Or. 72

Barry Joe STULL, Petitioner on Review, v. Mary M. HOKE, Nancy C. Antal and Brownstein, Rask, Sweeny, Grim, Kerr & DeSylvia, Respondents on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided November 14, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Barry Joe Stull, petitioner on review, filed the petition pro se.

Donald W. McEwen and Christine Coers-Mitchell, of McEwen, Gisvold, Rankin, Carter & Streinz, L.L.P., Portland, filed a brief on the merits on behalf of respondents on review Antal and Brownstein, Rask, Sweeny, Grim, Kerr & DeSylvia.

Lindsey H. Hughes, of Hallmark, Keating & Abbott, P.C., Portland, filed a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Oregon Association of Defense Counsel.

Richard S. Yugler, Maureen Leonard, and Jason Ring, Certified Law Student, Portland, filed a brief on behalf of amicus curiae Oregon Trial Lawyers Association.


KULONGOSKI, Justice.

The primary issue in this case is when a civil action is deemed commenced, for purposes of the statute of limitations, when the plaintiff who files the complaint is an indigent person who is incarcerated in a prison facility. For the reasons explained below, we hold that, in these circumstances, the action commences when the complaint is received by the court.

Plaintiff, an inmate at the Columbia...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases