CARRIGAN v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

CC 9409-06390; CA A87451, SC S43296.

949 P.2d 705 (1997)

326 Or. 97

Thomas CARRIGAN, Jr., Petitioner on Review, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, an Illinois Corporation, Respondent on Review.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Decided November 28, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles A. Ringo, of Dahn & Ringo, Beaverton, argued the cause and filed the petition on behalf of petitioner on review.

Thomas W. Brown, of Cosgrave, Vergeer & Kester, L.L.P., Portland, argued the cause on behalf of respondent on review. With him on the brief was Wendy M. Margolis, Portland.


KULONGOSKI, Justice.

This declaratory judgment case presents two issues: (1) whether Oregon's automobile personal injury protection (PIP) statutes, which provide coverage for injuries "resulting from the use, occupancy or maintenance of any motor vehicle," ORS 742.520(2)(a), quoted infra, 326 Or. at 100, 949 P.2d at 706, may extend to an injury inflicted by gunshot; and (2) if PIP coverage may be available, whether...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases