1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 127 F.3d
  5. 127 F.3d 1462 (1997)
 

SRI INTERN. v. ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES

No. 96-1437.

127 F.3d 1462 (1997)

SRI INTERNATIONAL, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY LABORATORIES, INC. and ATL Washington, Inc., Defendants-Appellants.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

October 23, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold J. McElhinny, Morrison & Foerster, LLP, San Francisco, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellee. With him on brief were Tamu K. Sudduth, San Francisco, CA, and Jana G. Gold, Palo Alto, CA.

Paul C. Saunders, Cravath, Swaine & Moore, New York City, argued for defendants-appellants. With him on briefs were Stephen B. Judlowe and William G. Todd, Hopgood, Calimafde, Kalil & Judlowe.

Before NEWMAN, MICHEL, and LOURIE, Circuit Judges.

PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is the damages phase of litigation between SRI International ("SRI") and Advanced Technology Laboratories and its subsidiary ATL Washington (together "ATL"). This court had sustained the validity and enforceability of United States Patent No. B1-4,016,750 (the '750 patent) and affirmed that certain claims were infringed by ATL. SRI Int'l, Inc. v. Advanced Tech. Lab., Inc., 45 F.3d 443 (Fed.Cir.1994) (Table). Following trial...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases