1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 947 P.2d
  5. 947 P.2d 626 (1997)
 

SILKETT v. ROYAL CROWN COLA BOTTLING CO.

93-4951; CA A89669.

947 P.2d 626 (1997)

151 Or. App. 187

Helen O. SILKETT, dba V & H Distributors, Respondent, v. ROYAL CROWN COLA BOTTLING CO. OF NORTH BEND, an Oregon Corporation, Dennis Mateski and Leslie A. Mateski, Appellants, and Gary Kelley Inc., a California Corporation, and Gary F. Kelley, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 5, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marily Wall, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With her on the briefs was Wall & Wall, P.C.

Margaretta M. Eakin, Portland, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondent.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.

ARMSTRONG, Judge.

Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff on a claim for tortious interference with economic relations. They assign error to, inter alia, the trial court's denial of their motion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint for failure to state a claim.1 We reverse and remand.

"In considering the sufficiency of plaintiff's complaint, we accept as true all well-pleaded allegations and all reasonable inferences...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases