WICKS-SNODGRASS v. CITY OF REEDSPORT

95-240; CA A96236.

939 P.2d 625 (1997)

148 Or. App. 217

June WICKS-SNODGRASS and Jim Lewis, Respondents-Cross-Petitioners, and Pauline Skinner and Bobby Beckley, Respondents-Cross-Respondents, v. CITY OF REEDSPORT, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 28, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bill Kloos, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Johnson, Kloos & Sherton, P.C.

Stephen Mountainspring, Roseburg, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents-cross-petitioners.

No appearance for respondents-cross-respondents.

Before DEITS, P.J., and RICHARDSON, C.J., and HASELTON, J.


DEITS, Presiding Judge.

Respondents Wicks-Snodgrass and Lewis1 appealed to LUBA from petitioner City of Reedsport's decision allowing an application for a residential subdivision, together with certain related applications. The city's decision became final on November 6, 1995, but notice of it was not mailed to the parties pursuant to ORS 227.173(3)2 until the next...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases