GADINSKY v. BRUNO

No. 96-0250.

695 So.2d 867 (1997)

Seth GADINSKY and Edward Gadinsky, Appellants, v. John BRUNO and Karen Sanzo, Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

June 18, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jay Starkman and Daniel L. Leyton of Delgado, Befeler, Starkman & Magolnick, P.A., Miami, for appellants.

Edward J. Pozzuoli of Beilly & Pozzuoli, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee Karen Sanzo.


DELL, Judge.

The trial court dismissed appellants' amended complaint for lack of prosecution, pursuant to rule 1.420(e), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure. Appellants raise four points on appeal, two of which require reversal of the trial court's order of dismissal.

First, the bankruptcy proceeding initiated by appellee Bruno was not concluded until ten months before the trial court's order of dismissal for lack of prosecution. The bankruptcy action constituted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases