1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 932 P.2d
  5. 932 P.2d 628 (1997)
 

MANOR v. NESTLE FOOD CO.

No. 63133-6.

932 P.2d 628 (1997)

131 Wash.2d 439

Paul E. MANOR and Lynette Manor, husband and wife, Respondents, v. NESTLE FOOD COMPANY, Petitioner.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided March 13, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rolland, O'Malley, Williams & Wyckoff, Wayne L. Williams, Olympia, for petitioner.

John H. McKean, Moses Lake, for respondent.

Craig A. Staples, Vancouver, for Amicus Curiae on Behalf of Washington Self-Insurers Ass'n.

TALMADGE, Justice.

Nestle Food Company (Nestle), a self-insured employer, paid more than $455,000 in medical and time-loss benefits to Paul Manor for a workplace injury he sustained. Now Manor wants to sue Nestle for the same injury. He asserts WAC 296-15-023(2), which declares Nestle to be Manor's employer, is invalid. Employing the standard of review set forth in our State's Administrative Procedure Act (APA), we hold the regulation is valid, and Nestle is therefore...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases