CORNELIOUS v. DC EMPLOYEES' COMP. APP. BD.

No. 96-CV-72.

704 A.2d 853 (1997)

Carl CORNELIOUS, Joan Harvill, Appellants, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA EMPLOYEES' COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD, Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided October 30, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joan A. Harvill, for appellants.

Jo Anne Robinson, Interim Corporation Counsel, with whom Charles L. Reischel, Deputy Corporation Counsel, and Edward E. Schwab, Assistant Corporation Counsel, were on the brief, for appellee.

Before WAGNER, Chief Judge, and KING, Associate Judge, and PRYOR, Senior Judge.


PER CURIAM:

Appellants assert that the rules regulating attorney's fees for contested worker's compensation claims arising under the Merit Personnel Act, D.C.Code Title 1-624.1 et seq. (1992 Repl. & 1997 Supp.) violate the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. We disagree and therefore affirm.

I.

Appellant Carl Cornelious worked for the Department of Corrections when he was injured on the job. He received disability compensation benefits...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases