1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 105 F.3d
  5. 105 F.3d 1437 (1997)
 

ENERCON INDUSTRIES CORP. v. PILLAR CORP.

No. 96-1132.

105 F.3d 1437 (1997)

ENERCON INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, and Ahlbrandt Systems, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. PILLAR CORPORATION, Pillar Technologies, Inc., and Pillar Technologies, L.P., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

January 31, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas O. Kloehn, Quarles & Brady, of Milwaukee, WI, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief were Michael A. Jaskolski and Barry E. Sammons.

Russell J. Barron, Foley & Lardner, of Milwaukee, WI, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Jeffrey N. Costakos and Ronald E. Barry, George E. Quillin, of counsel, Washington, D.C.

Before ARCHER, Chief Judge, SMITH, Senior Circuit Judge, and MICHEL, Circuit Judge.

DECISION

ARCHER, Chief Judge.

Enercon Industries Corp. and Ahlbrandt Systems, Inc. (collectively Enercon) appeal the "Decision and Order" (order) of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Wisconsin dismissing their claim for infringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,446,110 (the '110 patent) against Pillar Corp., Pillar Technologies, Inc., and Pillar Technologies, L.P. (collectively Pillar), Enercon Indus. v. Pillar Corp., No. 86-C-740...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases