MINISCE v. THOMPSON

C95-0662CV; CA A93944.

945 P.2d 582 (1997)

149 Or. App. 746

Phyllis MINISCE, Appellant, v. Robert W. THOMPSON and Robert W. Thompson, D.M.D., P.C., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 10, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stuart M. Brown, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Brown & Associates.

Karen O'Kasey, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief was Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt.

Before DEITS, C.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.


HASELTON, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals, assigning error to the entry of summary judgment against her complaint for dental malpractice. The trial court concluded that both of plaintiff's claims, which pertained to separate dental procedures, were barred by the statute of limitations. We affirm on one claim, which concerns the performance of a root canal, and reverse on the other claim, which concerns the placement of two crowns.1

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases