1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 934 P.2d
  5. 934 P.2d 587 (1997)
 

FRIEDRICH v. ADESMAN

95-0508-L-3; CA A88695.

934 P.2d 587 (1997)

146 Or. App. 624

Helen FRIEDRICH, Appellant, v. Peter W. ADESMAN; Robin H. Adesman, aka Robin H. Miller; Brian Adesman and David Adesman, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided March 5, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kurt H. Knudsen, Ashland, argued the cause and filed the briefs for appellant.

Benjamin M. Bloom, Medford, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before WARREN, P.J., and EDMONDS and ARMSTRONG, JJ.

EDMONDS, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment dismissing her amended complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a claim. ORCP 21 A(8). Her complaint contains four claims, and she assigns error to the court's ruling regarding each claim. Under ORCP 21 A(8), we consider only the facts alleged, assuming them to be true and giving plaintiff the benefit of all reasonable inferences that arise from the allegations. Glubka v. Long,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases