AUSTELL v. RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INC.

No. 96-1974.

120 F.3d 32 (1997)

David AUSTELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. RAYMOND JAMES & ASSOCIATES, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Decided July 22, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

ARGUED: Robert Edward Hoskins, Foster & Foster, L.L.P., Greenville, SC, for Appellant. Thomas Louis Stephenson, Nexsen, Pruet, Jacobs & Pollard, L.L.P., Greenville, SC, for Appellee. ON BRIEF: David M. Yokel, Mitchell, Bouton, Duggan, Yokel, McCall & Childs, Greenville, SC, for Appellant. Elizabeth M. McMillan, Nexsen, Pruet, Jacobs & Pollard, L.L.P., Greenville, SC, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and COPENHAVER, United States District Judge for the Southern District of West Virginia, sitting by designation.


Affirmed by published opinion. Judge COPENHAVER wrote the opinion, in which Chief Judge WILKINSON and Judge MICHAEL joined.

OPINION

COPENHAVER, District Judge:

The sole issue on appeal is whether the district court erred in determining that the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA), 29 U.S.C.A. § 1161(a), does not require sponsors of employee welfare benefit plans to offer continuation coverage for disability insurance.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases