1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 980 F.Supp.
  5. 980 F.Supp. 537 (1997)
 

U.S. v. MICROSOFT CORP.

No. CIV.A. 94-1564 TPJ.

980 F.Supp. 537 (1997)

UNITED STATES of America, Petitioner, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Respondent.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

December 11, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Donald J. Russell, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Anti-Trust Division, Telecomm/Task Force, Washington, DC, Anne K. Bingaman, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Division, Washington, DC, Phillip R. Malone, Steven C. Holtzman, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Antitrust Division, San Francisco, CA, for U.S.

Margaret Kolodny Pfeiffer, Sullivan & Cromwell, Washington, DC, James R. Weiss, Preston, Gates, Ellis & Rouvelas Meeds, Washington, DC, Richard J Urowsky, Steven L. Holley, Sullivan & Cromwell, New York City, William H. Neukom, Microsoft Corp., Law Dept., Redmond, WA, for Microsoft Corp.

Gary Leland Reback, Wilson, Sonsini, Goodrich & Rosati, Palo Alto, CA, for amicus Doe Parties.

Howard A. Topel, Mullin, Rhyne, Emmons & Topel, Washington, DC, for Lantec, Inc.

Jeffrey Steven Jacobovitz, Michaels, Wishner & Bonner, P.C. Washington, DC, for I.D.E. Corp.

John Haven Chapman, Tenzer & Greenblatt, L.L.P., Washington, DC, for Computer & Communications Industry Association.

Anthony R. Martin, Palm Beach, FL, pro se.

David Paul Murray, Willkie Farr & Gallagher, Washington, DC, for Bloomberg News.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

JACKSON, District Judge.

Current proceedings in this civil antitrust case were commenced by the petition of the United States, filed October 20, 1997, for an order to respondent Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") to show cause why it should not be found in civil contempt of the consent decree that brought the action to a temporary conclusion on August 21, 1995, namely, the Final Judgment entered by this Court on that date (hereinafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases