1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 678 N.E.2d
  5. 678 N.E.2d 832 (1997)
 

ANDERSON v. AAMCO DEALERS AD. POOL

No. 48A02-9602-CV-105.

678 N.E.2d 832 (1997)

Joseph ANDERSON and Mark Haines, Appellants-Defendants, v. INDIANAPOLIS INDIANA AAMCO DEALERS ADVERTISING POOL, Appellee-Plaintiff.

Court of Appeals of Indiana.

April 14, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Chris M. Teagle, Muncie, for Appellant Joseph Anderson.

Donald Dunnuck, Muncie, for Appellant Mark Haines.

James F. Beatty, Landman & Beatty, Indianapolis, for Appellee.

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellants-defendants Joseph Anderson and Mark Haines appeal a judgment in favor of appellee-plaintiff the Indianapolis, Indiana, AAMCO Dealer's Advertising Pool (Ad Pool) on its claim for breach of contract. Anderson and Haines contend that the trial court erred in entering judgment for the Ad Pool because the contract on which it sued violated the Indiana Deceptive Franchise Practices Act (Franchise Act). Further, Anderson and Haines...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases