PER CURIAM.
The appellant challenges an order by which his postconviction motion, pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, was denied. We affirm because appellant's challenge to the sufficiency of evidence used to convict him of a violation of probation is an issue for direct appeal, and therefore not cognizable under 3.850. See Williams v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.