1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 686 So.2d
  5. 686 So.2d 812 (1997)
 

AETNA CAS. & SUR. CO. v. ARCH-HOLMES-BRODER-NOTTING-HAM

No. 96-0211.

686 So.2d 812 (1997)

AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY, Appellant, v. ARCH-HOLMES-BRODER-NOTTING-HAM INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District.

January 29, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John H. Richards and Pamela R. Kittrell of Cooney, Mattson, Lance, Blackburn, Richards & O'Connor, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Neil Rose, North Bay Village, and Steven J. Chackman of Bernstein & Chackman, P.A., Hollywood, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary final judgment because the record supports the trial court's conclusion that the loss in question was covered under the builders risk policy. See Jones v. Utica Mut. Ins. Co., 463 So.2d 1153 (Fla.1985) (construction of insurance policy in defining scope of coverage is legal question to be determined by court); Tire Kingdom, Inc. v. First Southern Ins. Co., 573 So.2d...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases