1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 935 P.2d
  5. 935 P.2d 555 (1997)
 

SINTRA, INC. v. CITY OF SEATTLE

No. 62304-0.

935 P.2d 555 (1997)

131 Wash.2d 640

SINTRA, INC., an Oregon corporation qualified and doing business in Washington, Keith H. Hamack and Patty L. Hamack, husband and wife and their marital community; Arthur M. Stanley and Susan S. Stanley, husband and wife, and their marital community, Respondents/Cross Appellants, v. The CITY OF SEATTLE, a municipal corporation, Holly Miller and John Gayman, her husband; Ovid Thompson, a single person; David Moseley and Jane Doe Moseley, his wife, Beatrice Ryan and John Doe Ryan, her husband, Appellants/Cross Respondents.

Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

Decided April 17, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark Sidran, Seattle City Attorney, Robert C. Williams, Asst., Seattle, for appellants.

Richard B. Sanders, Bellevue, for respondents.

JOHNSON, Justice.

For a second time, we are asked to review a dispute between Sintra, Inc., and the City of Seattle involving the enforcement of Seattle's former Housing Preservation Ordinance (Ordinance). In Sintra, Inc. v. City of Seattle, 119 Wn.2d 1, 829 P.2d 765 (1992) (Sintra I), we held enforcement of the Ordinance violated substantive...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases