Louis A. MARKS, et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
UNITED STATES SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, et al., Defendants.
United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Newport News Division.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
March 6, 1997.
March 6, 1997.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Louis A. Marks, Jr., Hampton, VA, pro se.
Brenda J. Marks, Hampton, VA, pro se.
Jeremy S. Thompson, Hampton, VA, pro se.
Susan Lynn Watt, United States Attorney's Office, Norfolk, VA, for United States Social Security Administration, John Groover, U.S. Dept. of Veterans Affairs.
LaDale Kenneth George, Office of Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, James Stuart Gilmore, III, Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, William Henry Hurd, Richmond, VA, Jane D. Hickey, Office of the Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Commonwealth of Virginia, Department of Rehabilitative Services.
William Henry Hurd, Richmond, VA, Michael Paul Curreri, Bryan A. Fratkin, Wright, Robinson, McCammon, Osthimer & Tatum, Richmond, VA, Margaret Alice Browne, Office of the Attorney General, Richmond, VA, LaDale Kenneth George, Office of Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, James Stuart Gilmore, III, Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, Jane D. Hickey, Office of the Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Carolina Longa, MD, Luc Vinh, MD.
Donna J. Hall, Mays & Valentine, Norfolk, VA, Irma W. Merrill, Merrill, James & Merrill, Memphis, TN, for Bank of America, NT and SA, Boatman's National Mortgage Company.
Mary Christine Maggard, Shapiro and Burson, Virginia Beach, VA, for Shapiro and Burson Trading as Professional Foreclosure Corporation, Christine Patterson, Lori-Don MacNamee, Dana Powers.
Thomas Scott Carnes, Sykes, Carnes, Bourdon & Ahern, P.C., Virginia Beach, VA, for Long and Foster Realty, Lynn Therell, Bill Peiffer.
Alan Brody Rashkind, Furniss, Davis, Rashkind & Saunders, PC, Norfolk, VA, for A. Paul Burton.
United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Newport News Division.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
JACKSON, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
On August 6, 1996, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed in part, vacated in part and remanded the above-styled case to this court. In view of its holding in Biggs v. Meadows,66 F.3d 56 (4th Cir.1995), the Court of Appeals remanded this case for the limited purpose of addressing whether the appellants...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
