1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 561 N.W.2d
  5. 561 N.W.2d 919 (1997)
 

BERRES v. ANDERSON

Nos. C1-96-1723, C4-96-1795.

561 N.W.2d 919 (1997)

Richard BERRES, et al., Appellants (C1-96-1723), Respondents (C4-96-1795), v. Ronald ANDERSON, Defendant (C1-96-1723) Appellant (C4-96-1795), Susan Poirot, D.V.M., et al., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied June 11, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maury D. Beaulier, Beaulier Law Office, Bloomington, Lawrence H. Crosby, Crosby & Associates, St. Paul, for Appellants Berres, et al.

Thomas S. McEachron, Votel & Anderson, Minneapolis, for appellant Anderson.

Kent F. Spellman, Candlin & Wright, Bloomington (Thomas Countryman, St. Paul, of counsel), for Respondents.

Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, P.J., and WILLIS and MULALLY, JJ.

OPINION

EDWARD D. MULALLY,* Judge.

Richard and Kelly Berres and Berres Farms (the Berreses), plaintiffs in a veterinary medical malpractice action, and Ronald Anderson (Anderson), defendant and cross-claimant, appeal from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of respondents Susan Poirot, D.V.M., and the Farmington Veterinary Clinic (Poirot), contending the trial court erred in determining that the statute of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases