HOECK v. SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT

9409-06750; CA A88827.

945 P.2d 534 (1997)

149 Or. App. 607

Hans HOECK and Hoeck & Associates, a limited partnership, Appellants, v. SCHWABE, WILLIAMSON & WYATT, a law partnership, John Guinasso and Mark Stayer, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided September 10, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Clayton C. Patrick, Salem, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs was Patrick & Meadowbrook.

Peter Bunch, Spokane, WA, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Garr M. King and Kennedy, King & Zimmer, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, Senior Judge, and LANDAU and LEESON, JJ.


LANDAU, Judge.

Plaintiffs initiated this action for legal malpractice, alleging that defendants failed to provide adequate advice regarding the availability of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code as a means of satisfying creditors without losing certain real property. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of one of the attorneys on the ground that the action was time barred. The court dismissed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases