CITY OF LIVERMORE, Plaintiff and Respondent,
v.
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, Defendant and Appellant.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 3, 1997.
January 3, 1997.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
COUNSEL
Bruce R. Worthington, J. Michael Reidenbach, Richard L. Meiss and David J. Williamson for Defendant and Appellant.
Thomas R. Curry, City Attorney, Charles J. Williams and Teresa L. Highsmith for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Kane, Ballmer & Berkman, R. Bruce Tepper, Jr., Joseph W. Pannone, Michael J. Karger and Marc J. Manason as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.
OPINION
CORRIGAN, J.
(1a) When a municipal street-widening project is financed partly by assessment district funds and partly by fees imposed on development throughout the city, who must pay the cost of relocating utility poles to accommodate the new lanes of traffic? We conclude the utility company must pay.
Background
The facts relevant to this appeal are undisputed. Pacific Gas and Electric...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.