1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 957 F.Supp.
  5. 957 F.Supp. 477 (1997)
 

FONAR CORP. v. MAGNETIC RESONANCE PLUS, INC.

No. 93 Civ. 2220 (CBM).

957 F.Supp. 477 (1997)

FONAR CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. MAGNETIC RESONANCE PLUS, INC. and Robert Domenick, Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

March 13, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Scott A. Fields, Melville, NY, for Fonar Corp.

Dennis Reisman, Great Neck, NY, Lateef Mtima, Coudert Brothers, New York City, for Magnetic Resonance Plus, Inc., Robert Domenick.

OPINION

MOTLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiff Fonar Corporation ("Fonar") makes this motion for (1) judgment as a matter of law pursuant to Rule 50(b), or, in the alternative, for (2) a new trial pursuant to Rule 59(e), or (3) other relief from judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b). For the reasons explored below, this motion is granted in part and denied in part as to Rule 50(b) and granted in part as to Rule 59. The court does not address the motion pursuant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases