McCAMPBELL v. KPMG PEAT MARWICK

No. 3-96-CV-3136-H.

982 F.Supp. 445 (1997)

Maurice McCAMPBELL, Plaintiff, v. KPMG PEAT MARWICK, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division.

September 2, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maurice McCampbell, Houston, TX, pro se.

Kevin W. Vice, Sifford & Anderson, Dallas, TX, for Smith and Moore.

Floyd F. Honea, II, Winstead, Sechrest & Minick, Dallas, TX, for Greenbrier Operating Co.

Jay J. Madrid, Madrid & Brooks, Dallas, TX, for Ronald Cox.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KAPLAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendant Smith & Moore, L.L.P. has filed a motion for sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The motion has been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Jeff Kaplan for determination pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b).

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Maurice McCampbell was injured in a water skiing accident at a company picnic. He...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases