U.S. FOR USE AND BEN. OF ARROW CONCRETE CO. v. OHIO FARMERS INS. CO.

Civil Action No. 6:97-0677.

981 F.Supp. 443 (1997)

UNITED STATES of America, for the Use and Benefit of ARROW CONCRETE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. OHIO FARMERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant.

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Parkersburg Division.

October 16, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W. Full and John M. Ellem, Goodwin & Goodwin, Parkersburg, WV, for Plaintiff.

James A. Varner and Harold M. Sklar, McNeer, Highland, McMunn & Varner, Clarksburg, WV, for Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HADEN, Chief Judge.

Pending is Defendant's motion to dismiss, abstain, or hold in abeyance. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS in part the motion.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Arrow Concrete Company, the subcontractor, entered into an agreement to supply concrete to Lang Construction Company, the general contractor, for the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases