WOOTEN v. STATE

No. 71872.

956 S.W.2d 439 (1997)

Anthony WOOTEN, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

November 25, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Dave Hemingway, Asst. Sp. Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., Cheryl A. Caponegro, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before AHRENS, P.J., and CRANDALL and KAROHL, JJ.


ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the record on appeal and the briefs of the parties and find the determination of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 24.035(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. However, we have attached a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision for the use of the parties only.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases