LINN-WELL DEVELOPMENT CORP. v. PRESTON & FARLEY, INC.

No. 87385.

696 So.2d 693 (1997)

LINN-WELL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, et al., Petitioners, v. PRESTON & FARLEY, INC., et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida.

Clarification Denied July 10, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Richard Benjamin Wilkes and Anthony T. Leon of Gardner, Wilkes, Shaheen & Candelora, Tampa, for Petitioners.

Terry A. Smiljanich of Blasingame, Forizs & Smiljanich, P.A., St. Petersburg, for Respondents.


SHAW, Justice.

We have for review a decision ruling on the following question certified to be of great public importance:

IS A BUYER OF COMMERCIAL PROPERTY PREVENTED BY THE "ECONOMIC LOSS RULE" FROM RECOVERING DAMAGES FOR FRAUD IN THE INDUCEMENT AGAINST THE REAL ESTATE AGENT AND ITS INDIVIDUAL AGENT REPRESENTING THE SELLERS?

Linn-Well Dev. Corp. v. Preston & Farley, Inc., 666 So.2d 558 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases