1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 119 Ohio
  5. 119 Ohio App.3d 19 (1997)
 

DRAGE v. PROCTER & GAMBLE

No. C-960227.

119 Ohio App.3d 19 (1997)

DRAGE, Appellant, v. PROCTER & GAMBLE et al., Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Ohio, First District, Hamilton County.

Decided March 26, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Murray & Murray, John T. Murray and Patrick G. Warner, for appellant.

Dinsmore & Shohl, Thomas S. Calder, John D. Luken and Steven Benz, for appellee Procter & Gamble.

Graydon, Head & Ritchey, John B. Pinney and R.K. Wellington II, for appellees Edwin L. Artzt, Gordon F. Brunner, Gerald V. Dirvin, Durk I. Jager, Harald Einsmann, John E. Pepper, Erik G. Nelson, Edwin H. Eaton, Jr., and Raymond Mains.

HILDEBRANDT, Judge.

This case comes before the court on appeal from dismissal pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6) of the amended complaint of plaintiff-appellant Elaine Drage in the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas. Defendants-appellees in this case are Procter & Gamble ("P&G") and six of its directors and three of its officers ("the defendant directors"): Edwin L. Artzt, Gordon F. Brunner, Gerald V. Dirvin, Durk...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases