BEAGLE v. WALDEN

No. 95-2409.

78 Ohio St.3d 59 (1997)

BEAGLE, PETITIONER, v. WALDEN ET AL.; STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, RESPONDENT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 26, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey S. Wilkof, for petitioner.

Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs and David W. Hilkert; Meyers, Hentemann, Schneider & Rea and Henry A. Hentemann, for respondent.

Clark, Perdue, Roberts & Scott, Edward L. Clark and Glen R. Pritchard, in support of petitioner, for amicus curiae Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.

Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease, John J. Kulewicz and William D. Kloss, in support of respondent, for amicus curiae Ohio Insurance Institute.


COOK, J.

The United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, has certified the following question to this court pursuant to S.Ct. PracR. XVIII:

"Is Ohio Revised Code § 3937.18(A)(2) unconstitutional on any grounds under the facts of this case, including those stated by Plaintiff[?]"

We respond to the certified question as follows: We do not find R.C. 3937.18(A)(2) unconstitutional on any ground argued by the plaintiff...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases