DAHN v. U.S.

No. 96-4183.

127 F.3d 1249 (1997)

Karen DAHN and David L. Dahn, dba Karen's Auto Upholstery and Glass, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Claims, Inc., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES of America; Internal Revenue Service, Maureen Ames, Keith Finley, Lodging Rustler, Nupetco Associates and Neuman C. Petty, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

October 21, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Karen Dahn, David Dahn, pro se.

Bruce R. Ellisen and Curtis C. Pett, Tax Division, Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for Defendant-Appellee United States of America.

Before ANDERSON, BARRETT and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.


STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 10th Cir. R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

This appeal encompasses three of four cases consolidated in district court. The first, 93-C-953W, is a quiet title action under 28 U.S.C. ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases