GROSS v. EVERT-ROSENBERG

No. 37477-0-I.

933 P.2d 439 (1997)

85 Wash.App. 539

Kimberly GROSS, Appellant, v. Patricia A. EVERT-ROSENBERG, Respondent, and Does 1-20, Inclusive, Defendants.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

March 31, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sandra L. Simpson, Peter Edwin Moye, Workland, Witherspoon, Brajcich & Lipsker, P.L.L.C., Spokane, for Appellant.

M. Colleen Barrett, Gregory S. Worden, Julin, Fosso, Sage, McBride & Mason, Seattle, for Respondent.


GROSSE, Judge.

Is service of process sufficient where a party attempts substitute service by leaving a copy of the summons and complaint at a house owned by the defendant but in which she no longer lives? The issue to be determined is whether the place where the summons was left constitutes the defendant's house of usual abode. The superior court dismissed the suit finding that the house was not the defendant's usual place of abode and that the substitute service...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases