1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.3d
  4. 129 F.3d
  5. 129 F.3d 1237 (1997)
 

WU v. WANG

No. 96-1492.

129 F.3d 1237 (1997)

Jinn F. WU, Appellant, v. Ching-Rong WANG, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

November 6, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert V. Vickers, Vickers, Daniels & Young, Cleveland, OH, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

Richard E. Fitcher, Bacon & Thomas, of Alexandria, VA, for appellee. Of counsel was Charles R. Wolfe, Jr.

Nancy J. Linck, Solicitor, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Arlington, VA, for the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks. Of counsel were Albin F. Drost, Deputy Solicitor, Linda Moncys Isacson and Craig R. Kaufman, Associate Solicitors.

Before MICHEL, LOURIE and BRYSON, Circuit Judges.

ON MOTION

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

ORDER

This order decides motions made in an appeal from a decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences. Wang v. Wu, Interference No. 102,654 (July 19, 1996). The Board held that both Chin-Rong Wang's sole claim and all but two of Jinn F. Wu's claims corresponding to the count in the interference were unpatentable. The Board also held that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases