1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 966 F.Supp.
  5. 966 F.Supp. 395 (1997)
 

CITY-WIDE ASPHALT PAVING, INC. v. ALAMANCE COUNTY

Civil No. 2:96CV66.

966 F.Supp. 395 (1997)

CITY-WIDE ASPHALT PAVING, INC., Plaintiff, v. ALAMANCE COUNTY, Defendant.

United States District Court, M.D. North Carolina, Greensboro Division.

March 25, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. David James, Seth R. Cohen, Smith, Follin & James, Greensboro, NC, for Plaintiff.

James Redfern Morgan, Jr., Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, Winston-Salem, NC, S.C. Kitchen, Office of Durham County Attorney, Durham, NC, for Defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BULLOCK, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff, City-Wide Asphalt Paving, Inc. (City-Wide), a disappointed bidder, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Alamance County (the "County") for alleged deprivation of its Fourteenth Amendment rights and for violation of a state bidding statute. City-Wide claims it suffered damages in excess of $10,000.00 as a result of the County's decision...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases