1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 948 P.2d
  5. 948 P.2d 402 (1997)
 

STATE v. HARTKE

No. 15931-1-III.

948 P.2d 402 (1997)

89 Wash.App. 143

STATE of Washington, Respondent, v. Daniel Louis HARTKE, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Nine.

December 18, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey C. Barker, Wenatchee, for Appellant.

Roy S. Fore, Deputy Prosecuting Atty., Wenatchee, for Respondent.

SWEENEY, Chief Justice.

The question here is whether extending juvenile jurisdiction retroactively to collect restitution violates the ex post facto prohibition of the federal and state constitutions. U.S. Const. art. I, § 9; Const. art. I, § 23. Juvenile restitution is imposed for the primary purposes of compensating victims, juvenile accountability, and juvenile rehabilitation. State v. Sanchez,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases