OPINION
MILLS, District Judge.
An ERISA claim.
Plaintiff argues that the Court should review Defendant's decision to terminate benefits de novo.
Defendant argues that the Court should apply an arbitrary and capricious standard.
Bottom line: Because the ERISA plan's language gives Defendant discretionary authority to determine eligibility for benefits or to construe the terms of the plan, the Court reviews Defendant...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.