TIMEX CORP. v. STOLLER

No. 3:95 CV 2505(GLG).

961 F.Supp. 374 (1997)

TIMEX CORPORATION, Plaintiff, v. Leo STOLLER, individually and d/b/a Sentra Sporting Goods U.S.A. CO., Stealth Industries, Inc. d/b/a Stealth Industries, Inc. and U.S.A. Imports, S Industries, Inc. and John Does 1-15, Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Connecticut.

April 7, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank T. Judge, III, Kathryn Patridge, Timex Corp., Middlebury, CT, for Plaintiff.

John C. Brezina, Chicago, IL, for Defendants.


OPINION

GOETTEL, District Judge.

Plaintiff Timex Corporation ("Timex") moves for summary judgment on each count of its complaint. Defendants cross move for summary judgment based on unclean hands. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiff's motion (Document # 30) is GRANTED and defendants' motion (Document # 39) is DENIED.

BACKGROUND

Defendant Leo Stoller is a citizen of the State of Illinois. He is the current president...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases