1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 949 P.2d
  5. 949 P.2d 386 (1997)
 

HOLLMANN v. CORCORAN

No. 16192-7-III.

949 P.2d 386 (1997)

89 Wash.App. 323

James HOLLMANN, Appellant, v. James CORCORAN and "Jane Doe" Corcoran, husband and wife, and the marital community comprised thereof, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3. Panel Nine.

December 23, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jennifer R. Willner, Bellingham, Debra L. Stephens, Spokane, for Appellant.

James M. Danielson, Jeffers, Danielson, Sonn, Wenatchee, for Respondents.

KURTZ, Judge.

James Hollmann contends in dismissing his case against James Corcoran as a matter of law, the court erred in (1) interpreting RCW 4.16.340(1)(c) to contain a constructive discovery/due diligence requirement; (2) applying this constructive discovery standard without regard to the particular circumstances of Mr. Hollmann relating to his emotional and psychological injuries that impeded his discovery; and (3) concluding Mr. Hollmann should have discovered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases