STRICKLIN v. SOUED

96-0569-L-1; CA A93907.

936 P.2d 398 (1997)

147 Or. App. 399

William A. STRICKLIN, Appellant, v. Frederick A. SOUED, Joanne E. Soued, and Enterprises Entres Nous, a partnership, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 16, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Molly Jo Mullen, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With her on the briefs were Peter R. Chamberlain, Portland, and Bodyfelt Mount Stroup & Chamberlain.

Karen C. Allan, Medford, argued the cause for respondents. With her on the brief was Foster, Purdy, Allan, Peterson & Dahlin.

Before DEITS, P.J., and De MUNIZ and HASELTON, JJ.


De MUNIZ, Judge.

Plaintiff appeals the dismissal of his action on a promissory note for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter. ORCP 21 A(1). We review the trial court's legal determination that it was divested of jurisdiction, see Greeninger v. Cromwell, 127 Or.App. 435, 438, 873 P.2d 377 (1994) (circuit courts have subject matter jurisdiction over all actions unless a statute or...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases