1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 974 F.Supp.
  5. 974 F.Supp. 345 (1997)
 

MATSUSHITA ELECTRONICS CORP. v. LORAL CORP.

No. 92 Civ. 5461(BSJ).

974 F.Supp. 345 (1997)

MATSUSHITA ELECTRONICS CORP., Plaintiff, v. LORAL CORP. and Loral Fairchild Corp., Defendants.

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

August 22, 1997.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Morton Amster, Hopgood, Calimafde, Kalil & Judlowe, New York City, Daniel Ebenstein, Michael J. Berger, Amster Rothstein & Ebenstein, New York City, for plaintiff.

Edward M. Spiro, Morvillo, Abramowitz, Grand, Iason & Silberberg, New York City, for defendants.

OPINION

JONES, District Judge.

In September 1991, defendants Loral Corporation and Loral Fairchild Corporation (collectively, "Loral") brought suit in the Eastern District of Virginia (the "Eastern District Litigation")1 against Matsushita Electronics, Inc. ("MEI") and other major electronics manufacturers for infringing upon patents owned by Loral (the "patents-in-suit"). The patents-in-suit cover certain charged coupled devices...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases