STATE v. SCHROEDER

No. C5-96-929.

560 N.W.2d 739 (1997)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Edwin George SCHROEDER, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied May 20, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Attorney General, Robert A. Stanich, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, for Respondent.

Raymond F. Schmitz, Olmsted County Attorney, Rochester, for Respondent.

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Scott G. Swanson, Assistant State Public Defender, Minneapolis, for Appellant.

Considered and decided by DAVIES, P.J., and RANDALL and SHORT, JJ..


OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant Edwin George Schroeder challenges his conviction on the ground that his incriminating statements should have been suppressed because the arresting officers violated the Scales requirement that custodial interrogation be recorded. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant was arrested for assisting in a burglary. Immediately after his arrest, he was placed in a police squad car and read his Miranda rights...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases