CARRIER v. PRO-TECH RESTORATION

No. 960118.

944 P.2d 346 (1997)

Shirley CARRIER, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. PRO-TECH RESTORATION dba Stone Carpets, William Roger Smith, and The City of Pleasant Grove, Defendants and Petitioners.

Supreme Court of Utah.

August 8, 1997.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lynn C. Harris, Provo, and Vicki Rinne, Highland, for Carrier.

M. Dayle Jeffs, Provo, for Pro-Tech Restoration and Stone Carpets.

Robert L. Moody, Provo, for Smith.

John M. Chipman, Salt Lake City, for Pleasant Grove.


ON CERTIORARI TO THE UTAH COURT OF APPEALS

ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:

Defendant Pro-Tech Restoration ("Pro-Tech") seeks review of the court of appeals' decision ordering a new trial because the trial court had incorrectly determined that Pro-Tech and defendant William Smith had sufficiently disparate interests to warrant separate allocations of peremptory challenges under rule 47 of the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure. See Carrier v. Pro-Tech Restoration...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases